You know what I feakin’ love? Pokemon. I’ve been a huge fan
since Red and Blue came out way back in the late 90’s, so a majority of my life.
I’ve owned at least one game from every single generation, and I’ve loved them
all. Every generation introduces a new batch of Pokemon, and I hear more and
more about how every new generation is worse than the last, or how only the
original 151 count, or some other nonsense. I’m certainly not the first person
to point this out, but I still think it needs to be said here in this blog that
like three people read. The new Pokemon aren’t any worse than the old ones, a
combination of nostalgia and maturity has caused people to love the original Pokémon
and dismiss the new ones.
Here’s a great picture I found that
brilliantly illustrates my point:
The people who dismiss everything after the first or second generations even have a name, genwunners. They refuse to see logic and only let their
own fond memories of the “good ol’ days” influence their opinion, saying things like “Everything
after gen 3 is crap.”
It’s impossible to not look at something from our past
through a nostalgic lens. Of course most people will have an emotional connection
to something they have found memories of as a child, which exist with the first
couple of Pokemon generations, but we don’t have that kind of connection to new
Pokemon. Everything seems cooler when you are a kid, even really stupid stuff.
Think back to a dumb movie you really liked when you were young; for me I’ll
use the example of Batman and Robin.
I loved that movie when I was a kid, and it came out around the same time Red and Blue did. Batman and Robin
is just an awful movie, I can barely sit though it today, but when I was a dumb
kid I was easily impressed. For that same reason I was so much more impressed
with the original Pokemon than recent ones.
In fact I think the first generation of Pokémon is probably
the weakest and most boring batch of Pokemon. Now this may sound like sacrilege,
but stay with me here. Since they were the first Pokemon, they were pretty basic;
they were mostly just cooler versions of animals, the Pokemon creators really
hadn’t gotten too creative with a majority of Pokemon. Take Kingler for
example, is he really that great of a Pokemon? No, he is a pretty ordinary crab,
he isn’t some cool version of a crab. Compare him to Crawdaunt, a crab Pokemon from
the third gen that actually looks more like something cool that someone
imagined and not an ordinary crab. What’s more is he is a water/dark type
instead of just pure water, which brings me to my next point.
Since everything was new in the first gen the type combinations were really basic and boring. The only really interesting type combination was Jynx, a physic/ice type, one cool type combination out of 151. There was an abundance of the boring type combos, ice/water, grass/poison, rock/ground, and the like. Subsequent generations need fresh new ideas since the novelty of Pokemon just existing was wearing off, and as a result interesting new Pokemon with just about every imaginable type combo showed up.
The second generation (my favorite gen) even introduced two
new types to add more variety that the originals lacked. The more Pokémon we
get the more interesting type combo and new ideas for Pokémon showed up. Look
at the Dragons or the Ghosts, for example, there was only one family of each
type in the first gen because they are so rare. Both the Gengar and
Dragonite families are pretty basic; “Here’s the ghost family and here’s the
Dragon family.” Now we have much more unique and creative dragons and ghosts
with varied type combos.
Now people love to point out awful Pokemon as the reason
that new Pokémon suck. However, a few bad Pokemon don’t spoil the entire
generation. My least favorite Pokemon of all time is Garbodor, a literal pile of
trash and, yes it’s from the most recent generation of Pokemon. But I love so
many more of the newest Pokémon that one really terrible one doesn’t ruin all the great ones. There are so many new Pokemon introduced every gen that a few are
bound to be crap. Look at my favorite gen, gen 2, Dunsparce is from that gen.
That Pokémon is so awful I legitimately forgot it existed for a few years,
until it popped up in some game I was playing and I groaned in disgust as the
memories of this little useless piece of crap came back to me. Generation 1 is
no exception either. Remember Tangela? That terribly designed Pokémon is
literally just eyes, vines and feet. It looks like one of those guys Ronald
McDonald hung out with in the 80s.
Before you say that every new Pokemon is terrible because of one ice cream cone shaped Pokemon, take a second and look back at all
the stupid Pokemon of the past, and realize how cool a bunch of the new ones
actually are. And yeah, I'm pretty excited for the new guys we'll get in X and Y.
1 comment:
Okay, I'll be honest here. I ONLY like one Pokemon from Gen 5. Scraggy. He was adorable. And before you jump at me, I'm not saying I didn't like gen 5, because I did. I loved, LOVED Black 2 and White 2. They were awesome when I played them for the first time. When I first got White, I couldn't put my DS down for at least 2 days. But honestly, I hated most of the Pokemon's designs. And I looooved Gen 2. It was soo perfect. Heracross is literally perfect. I don't "hate" any generation of Pokemon, and I own every single Pokemon game. I've beaten all of them at least 2 times each, and I intend on getting BOTH X and Y when they come out 4 months from now.
Post a Comment