Dawn of the Planet of the Apes is a sequel to a reboot of a classic movie (that already had a failed remake once before) which was itself based on a book. Given that, the film doesn't exactly sound promising because, as everybody knows, films based on an existing franchise are inherently bad, or at the very least uninspired. Conventional wisdom tells us that movies today are all unoriginal, which is why we have so many reboots and sequels, and why the film industry is going downhill fast. Unsurprisingly, convention wisdom could not be more wrong, and nothing proves that more than Dawn of the Planet of the Apes, which is arguably the best film of the year.
As always with this type of post, SPOILERS:
It’s understandable that there has been a lot of backlash against
reboots/remakes and sequels. A lot of the time it’s a studio trying to make a
quick buck by giving us a totally unnecessary sequel, like turning good
movies like Hangover and Taken into a disappointing trilogies, or
the Spider-man reboots, which I’ve made my hatred for known before. The thing
is a few bad eggs don’t mean that every sequel or reboot is a hollow money
grab. Unfortunately, because of these films, sequels and reboots tend to get a bad rap.
As long as a film is crafted with care and precision, with an emotional core, regardless if it is an adaptation of a previous flick, it at least has a chance
to be something great. This is the difference between Tim Burton’s 2001 Planet of the Apes remake and Rise of the Planet of the Apes, Dawn's predecessor. One is obviously a shallow attempt to cash in on the title, while ignoring much of the
social commentary of the originals, and the other is a complex and indicate
tale with; subtle callbacks to the original, a setup for a potential sequel, but still managing to tell its own self-contained story.
Apes isn’t the
only film to dispel the notion that good huge budget films are a thing of the
past; 2014 was absolutely chalked full of awesome intelligent movies, including
Guardians of the Galaxy, Interstellar, and The Lego Movie, just to name a few of the blockbusters. Sure there
were a few crappy ones, like Transformers
4, but these days there are just more films released every year, which means both more good and
bad movies are released every year. Of course, there is the illusion that the
past had a smaller ratio of bad films simply because we remember the good films
as time passes and forget the bad ones, since (generally speaking) only good
films are memorable. Anyone who has seen an episode of Mystery Science Theater 3000 knows that the past is overflowing with
terrible forgotten films. After all, who five years from now is going to remember
Pompeii? It was a huge release early
this year, but chances are that you’ve already forgotten about it. Films like Dawn of the Planet of the Apes on the
other hand are here to stay.
In fact, an argument could be made (and I’m about to make
it) that because of modern advances, films today have the opportunity to be
better than they were in the past. Andy Serkins is once again getting some much
deserved Oscar buzz for a motion capture performance as the ape Caesar, and it would not have
been possible without today’s technology. Consider the original Planet of the Apes films, where actors
wore rubber masks. Frankly it looked incredibly cheesy, and severely restricted
the actors’ performances. Today we can turn an actor into an ape and preserve
every subtle motion on his face, while allowing him to move freely and naturally in
way that was never possible before.
There is a shot near the beginning of Dawn where Caesar jumps in the air, killing a bear with a spear. Something like this would never have been possible in the original Apes movies. This is not to say that simply having this technology in a film makes it inherently better, because when a film exists to prop up its effects (as I discuss in my review of Gravity) the film fails. However, when the effects are just one part of an entire formula, it can create a mesmerizing film.
There is a shot near the beginning of Dawn where Caesar jumps in the air, killing a bear with a spear. Something like this would never have been possible in the original Apes movies. This is not to say that simply having this technology in a film makes it inherently better, because when a film exists to prop up its effects (as I discuss in my review of Gravity) the film fails. However, when the effects are just one part of an entire formula, it can create a mesmerizing film.
All of these parts truly come together in Dawn. Serkins isn’t the only actor in
the film to give an amazing performance, as both the motion captured apes, and
the regular human characters are preformed beautifully. Everyone in the film manages
to portray a character that has lost something, as their world is one rocked by
tragedy. Some of the best moments in the film are the silent ones where a live
action actor interacting with a motion capture one. One that particularly
sticks out in my mind is the scene where teenage human Alexander (Kodi
Smit-McPhee) and the orangutan Maurice (Karin Konoval) reading a comic book
together. These kind of characters, which see beyond being ape or human, and
come together, are film’s real heroes.
In contrast, the characters who simply see the world in
black and white are the ones that cause the conflict in the film. While the Caesar and one of the human leaders, Malcolm (Jason Clarke) are able to relate to
each other, Caesar’s lieutenant Koba (Toby Kebbell) and the other human leader
Dreyfus (Gary Oldman) are only interested in their own group’s interests. Koba,
while selfish and traitorous has a tragic backstory, once a laboratory ape,
covered from head to toe in the scars from those days where humans constantly
sliced him open. Along with his need for power, Koba’s hatred for humans is his
defining character trait. Dreyfus on the other hand is a much more noble
character. He also has a tragic backstory, with his wife, children and friends, all long dead. Dryfus only wants to protect humanity, even going as far as to
sacrifice his own life to do so. Like Koba, who sees humans as all evil torturers,
Dryfus sees all apes simply as wild, uncontrollable, unreasonable animals.
Their refusal to listen to reason leads us to a climax where it seems that
peace will be a thing of the past. Although Malcolm remains optimistic about
peace after the dust has seemingly settled, Creaser knows that they have reached a point of no
return, and he blames himself for putting his faith in Koba simply because he was
an ape.
None of this would have been possible if it weren't for the
foundation of the films on which Dawn
is based. Instead of a blank slate this film had an remarkably strong point to
build on.The audince isn't simply thrown into jump a post-apocalyptic world, we had the first
film to set up the events of said apocalypse, as well as introducing characters, including Caesar and Koba. Dawn owes more than just it's basic idea from the original films, cherrypicking all kinds of themes and even Caesar's name from the movies. It also blazed it's own path though, incorporating new ideas with the old, touching on poinent themes in bold new directions, exceeding all of it's source material and becoming the best Planet of the Apes of all time.
No comments:
Post a Comment